inequality is toxic

I’m normally swayed by social analyses that stress the complexity of social processes. You may expect quite a few posts to come on that perspective.

But recently I read a book called The spirit Level, why Equality is Better for Everyone  that utterly persuaded me of a a simple straight forward relationship between one macro variable and an lot of what all of us think pretty important in personal and social life.

The authors have started a Foundation, the Equality Trust, to share their research, engage with their critics, and try and influence public debate and policy making. It’s one of the  best sites I know, extremely content rich with many downloads, data and analyses, and the book it is all based on is one of the best books on quantitative analysis I’ve ever read. There is an unbelievable serious effort to explain, explore and address any possible question, reservation, or criticism anyone might have of the data, the analysis and the conclusions. And it’s done in an ongoing way. Data, analysis, and engagement with critics is updated as they become available. It’s social science that makes me proud. And the message is important, what do I say, it’s IMPORTANT.

The site has a short summary of the core evidence presented in the book and I copy that here in the hope that you’ll check it out.

Why More Equality?

 Evidence shows that:

1) In rich countries, a smaller gap between rich and poor means a happier, healthier, and more successful population. Just look at the US, the UK, Portugal, and New Zealand in the top right of this graph, doing much worse than Japan, Sweden or Norway in the bottom left.

health and social problems are worse in more unequal countries source:

health and social problems are worse in more unequal countries

2) Meanwhile, more economic growth will NOT lead to a happier, healthier, or more successful population. In fact, there is no relation between income per head and social well-being in rich countries.

3) If the UK were more equal, we’d be better off as a population. For example, the evidence suggests that if we halved inequality here:

– Murder rates could halve
– Mental illness could reduce by two thirds
– Obesity could halve
– Imprisonment could reduce by 80%
– Teen births could reduce by 80%
– Levels of trust could increase by 85%

4) It’s not just people in poorer communities who would do better. The evidence suggests people all the way up would benefit, although it’s true that the poorest would gain the most.

5) These findings hold true, whether you look across developed nations, or across the 50 states of the USA.

One element that is not emphasized much in the authors’ work itself, but which struck me as a very important addition to what seems to be a growing awareness within some US circles that inequality is getting totally out of hand: the extreme outlying position of the US, the wealthiest, most powerful country in the world. The comparative picture is very sobering indeed, pretty much incomprehensible to a Northwest European, but given the source of most of our ideological changes, all the more scary.

This entry was posted in society and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to inequality is toxic

  1. Pingback: simple thoughts on understanding anything | roger henke's fancies

  2. Pingback: in the social sciences it’s called relative deprivation | roger henke's fancies

  3. Pingback: rhetoric and thinking | roger henke's fancies

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s